REFERENCES
1. Do, H. H. Recent progress and perspectives of Co3O4-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 2025, 26, 667-78.
2. Wang, N.; Zhou, J.; Ren, J. Recent advances in CO2 capture and utilization: from the perspective of process integration and optimization. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2025, 216, 115688.
3. Kumar, H.; Sharma, R.; Malik, A. K.; Sharma, A. K.; Kumar, P.; Singh, D. Advancements in carbon capture and utilization technologies: transforming CO2 into valuable resources for a sustainable carbon economy. Next. Energy. 2026, 10, 100476.
4. Li, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, J.; Meng, L.; Li, J.; Huang, M. Advances in the application of metal-organic frameworks(MOFs) for carbon capture and catalytic conversion. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 120065.
5. Bharatee, R. K.; Quaff, A. R.; Jaiswal, S. K. Advances in perovskite membranes for carbon capture & utilization: a sustainable approach to CO2 emissions reduction - A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 380, 124924.
6. Devadiga, M. M.; Bhat, A. S.; Sarangi, S.; et al. Describing critical barriers in commercial deployment of CO2 capture and utilization technologies. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2026, 19, 743-90.
7. Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhong, Y.; et al. sp2/sp3-hybridized nitrogen-mediated electrochemical CO2 capture and utilization. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadw6592.
8. Ganiyu, S. A. Review of zeolitic-based sorbents for CO2 capture: insights into functional modifications, economic feasibility and machine learning-enhanced strategies. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2025, 23, 100818.
9. Whaieb, A. H.; Jasim, F. T.; Abdulrahman, A. A.; et al. Tailoring zeolites for enhanced post-combustion CO2 capture: a critical review. Curr. Res. Green. Sustain. Chem. 2025, 10, 100451.
10. Darunte, L. A.; Walton, K. S.; Sholl, D. S.; Jones, C. W. CO2 capture via adsorption in amine-functionalized sorbents. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2016, 12, 82-90.
11. Khan, S. A.; Ahmed, S.; Ali, S.; Altaf, F. Advances in CO2 capture materials: from strategies to CO2-based fertilizers for a sustainable future. Carbon. Neutral. 2025, 4, e70063.
12. Zentou, H.; Hoque, B.; Abdalla, M. A.; et al. Recent advances and challenges in solid sorbents for CO2 capture. Carbon. Capture. Sci. Technol. 2025, 15, 100386.
13. Ibitoye, S. E.; Mahamood, R. M.; Jen, T.; Loha, C.; Akinlabi, E. T. An overview of biomass solid fuels: biomass sources, processing methods, and morphological and microstructural properties. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2023, 8, 333-60.
14. Chandran, C.; Mohan, M.; Dawi, E.; et al. Biochar-derived carbon nanomaterials in electrocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production. Chem. Rec. 2025, 26, 2500093.
15. Lam, E.; Luong, J. H. Carbon materials as catalyst supports and catalysts in the transformation of biomass to fuels and chemicals. ACS. Catal. 2014, 4, 3393-410.
16. Peters, J. F.; Iribarren, D.; Dufour, J. Biomass pyrolysis for biochar or energy applications? A life cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 5195-202.
17. Shaheen, J.; Fseha, Y. H.; Sizirici, B. Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass. Heliyon 2022, 8, e12388.
18. El Refaay, D.; Khalafallah, D.; Wang, Z.; Henaish, A.; Lin, W.; Zhang, Q. Waste-to-wealth: biomass-derived sustainable materials for energy storage applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2026, 156, 254-90.
19. Afridi, A. M.; Aktary, M.; Shaheen Shah, S.; et al. Advancing electrical engineering with biomass-derived carbon materials: applications, innovations, and future directions. Chem. Rec. 2024, 24, e202400144.
20. Yu, S.; Zhang, W.; Dong, X.; et al. A review on recent advances of biochar from agricultural and forestry wastes: Preparation, modification and applications in wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111638.
21. Xu, J.; Xie, Y.; Yao, Q.; Lv, L.; Chu, H. Advances in sustainable nano-biochar: precursors, synthesis methods and applications. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 15009-32.
22. Meng, X.; Gao, S.; Kozinski, J. A.; Ruan, R.; Fang, Z. Biochar-based oxygen electrocatalysts for advanced Zn-air batteries: mechanisms, applications, and prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 2026, 529, 172878.
23. Afshar, M.; Mofatteh, S. Biochar for a sustainable future: Environmentally friendly production and diverse applications. Results. Eng. 2024, 23, 102433.
24. Manikandan, S.; Vickram, S.; Subbaiya, R.; et al. Comprehensive review on recent production trends and applications of biochar for greener environment. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 388, 129725.
25. Guo, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, L.; Sun, Y.; Liu, L. Recent advances in biochar-based adsorbents for CO2 capture. Carbon. Capture. Sci. Technol. 2022, 4, 100059.
26. Zhang, Y.; Wang, S.; Feng, D.; et al. Functional biochar synergistic solid/liquid-phase CO2 capture: a review. Energy. Fuels. 2022, 36, 2945-70.
27. Dissanayake, P. D.; You, S.; Igalavithana, A. D.; et al. Biochar-based adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture: a critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2020, 119, 109582.
28. Cetin, E.; Moghtaderi, B.; Gupta, R.; Wall, T. Influence of pyrolysis conditions on the structure and gasification reactivity of biomass chars. Fuel 2004, 83, 2139-50.
29. Leng, L.; Huang, H. An overview of the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar stability. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 270, 627-42.
30. Fakayode, O. A.; Aboagarib, E. A. A.; Zhou, C.; Ma, H. Co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic and macroalgae biomasses for the production of biochar - A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122408.
31. He, Q.; Cheng, C.; Raheem, A.; Ding, L.; Shiung, Lam. S.; Yu, G. Effect of hydrothermal carbonization on woody biomass: from structure to reactivity. Fuel 2022, 330, 125586.
32. Böttger, J.; Eckhard, T.; Pflieger, C.; Senneca, O.; Muhler, M.; Cerciello, F. Green coal substitutes for boilers through hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: pyrolysis and combustion behavior. Fuel 2023, 344, 128025.
33. You, S.; Ok, Y. S.; Chen, S. S.; et al. A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: Energy and environmental applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 242-53.
34. Li, J.; Dai, J.; Liu, G.; et al. Biochar from microwave pyrolysis of biomass: a review. Biomass. Bioenergy. 2016, 94, 228-44.
35. Hadiya, V.; Popat, K.; Vyas, S.; et al. Biochar production with amelioration of microwave-assisted pyrolysis: current scenario, drawbacks and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 355, 127303.
36. Pallarés, J.; González-Cencerrado, A.; Arauzo, I. Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam. Biomass. Bioenergy. 2018, 115, 64-73.
37. Thue, P. S.; Lima, D. R.; Lima, E. C.; et al. Comparative studies of physicochemical and adsorptive properties of biochar materials from biomass using different zinc salts as activating agents. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107632.
38. Chen, W.; Gong, M.; Li, K.; et al. Insight into KOH activation mechanism during biomass pyrolysis: chemical reactions between O-containing groups and KOH. Appl. Energy. 2020, 278, 115730.
39. Yang, H.; Chen, P.; Chen, W.; et al. Insight into the formation mechanism of N, P co-doped mesoporous biochar from H3PO4 activation and NH3 modification of biomass. Fuel. Process. Technol. 2022, 230, 107215.
40. Lin, Y.; Dai, W.; Cao, J.; Zou, Y.; Feng, C.; Liu, H. Biomass-derived carbon electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction: Progress and perspective. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2026, 1007, 119837.
41. Clemente-Castro, S.; Palma, A.; Ruiz-Montoya, M.; Giráldez, I.; Díaz, M. J. Optimizing pyrolysis parameters and product analysis of a fluidized bed pilot plant for Leucaena leucocephala biomass. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2023, 35, 88.
42. Li, J.; Xu, K.; Yao, X.; Liu, J.; Su, D.; Wang, B. Study on the effect of biochar catalyst on the formation of biomass slow pyrolysis products. Fuel 2025, 392, 134862.
43. Dananjaya, V.; Hansika, N.; Chevali, V.; et al. Advancing energy storage technologies beyond lithium with cellulose-derived sustainable carbon materials. Small. Struct. 2025, 7, e202500551.
44. Song, Y.; Tan, J.; Jin, M.; et al. Effect of pyrolysis temperature and heating rate on the physicochemical properties of alkali lignin-derived biochar: a comparative study of fast and slow pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2025, 191, 107236.
45. Conti, R.; Fabbri, D.; Vassura, I.; Ferroni, L. Comparison of chemical and physical indices of thermal stability of biochars from different biomass by analytical pyrolysis and thermogravimetry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2016, 122, 160-8.
46. Tripathi, M.; Sahu, J.; Ganesan, P. Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2016, 55, 467-81.
47. Fang, J.; Zhan, L.; Ok, Y. S.; Gao, B. Minireview of potential applications of hydrochar derived from hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 57, 15-21.
48. Adeniyi, A. G.; Iwuozor, K. O.; Emenike, E. C.; et al. Leaf-based biochar: a review of thermochemical conversion techniques and properties. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2024, 177, 106352.
49. Wang, Q.; Wu, S.; Cui, D.; et al. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of organic solid wastes to hydrochar as potential fuel: a review. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 850, 158034.
50. Ma, R.; Fakudze, S.; Shang, Q.; et al. Catalytic hydrothermal carbonization of pomelo peel for enhanced combustibility of coal/hydrochar blends and reduced CO2 emission. Fuel 2021, 304, 121422.
51. Heidari, M.; Dutta, A.; Acharya, B.; Mahmud, S. A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. J. Energy. Inst. 2019, 92, 1779-99.
52. Guo, S.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Urea/ZnCl2 in situ hydrothermal carbonization of Camellia sinensis waste to prepare N-doped biochar for heavy metal removal. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 30365-73.
53. Querejeta, N.; Gil, M. V.; Rubiera, F.; Pevida, C. Sustainable coffee-based CO2 adsorbents: toward a greener production via hydrothermal carbonization. Greenhouse. Gases. 2017, 8, 309-23.
54. Zhang, Z.; Cano, Z. P.; Luo, D.; Dou, H.; Yu, A.; Chen, Z. Rational design of tailored porous carbon-based materials for CO2 capture. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 7, 20985-1003.
55. Schonvogel, D.; Nowotny, M.; Woriescheck, T.; et al. Hydrothermal carbonization-derived carbon from waste biomass as renewable Pt support for fuel cell applications: role of carbon activation. Energy. Technol. 2019, 7, 1900344.
56. Rajput, V.; Saini, I.; Parmar, S.; et al. Biochar production methods and their transformative potential for environmental remediation. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2024, 6, 408.
57. Hansen, V.; Müller-Stöver, D.; Ahrenfeldt, J.; Holm, J. K.; Henriksen, U. B.; Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. Gasification biochar as a valuable by-product for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. Biomass. Bioenergy. 2015, 72, 300-8.
58. Zhang, Y.; Wan, L.; Guan, J.; Xiong, Q.; Zhang, S.; Jin, X. A review on biomass gasification: effect of main parameters on char generation and reaction. Energy. Fuels. 2020, 34, 13438-55.
59. Fryda, L.; Visser, R. Biochar for soil improvement: evaluation of biochar from gasification and slow pyrolysis. Agriculture 2015, 5, 1076-115.
60. Peterson, S. C.; Jackson, M. A. Simplifying pyrolysis: using gasification to produce corn stover and wheat straw biochar for sorptive and horticultural media. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2014, 53, 228-35.
61. Brewer, C. E.; Schmidt-Rohr, K.; Satrio, J. A.; Brown, R. C. Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy. 2009, 28, 386-96.
62. Zhang, Y.; Fan, S.; Liu, T.; Fu, W.; Li, B. A review of biochar prepared by microwave-assisted pyrolysis of organic wastes. Sustain. Energy. Technol. Assess. 2022, 50, 101873.
63. Shen, Y. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes for hydrogen production. Green. Chem. 2025, 27, 10402-22.
64. Suresh, A.; Alagusundaram, A.; Kumar, P. S.; et al. Microwave pyrolysis of coal, biomass and plastic waste: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 3609-29.
65. Foong, S. Y.; Chan, Y. H.; Yek, P. N. Y.; et al. Microwave-assisted pyrolysis in biomass and waste valorisation: insights into the life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA). Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 491, 151942.
66. Skubiszewska-Zięba, J.; Charmas, B.; Kołtowski, M.; Oleszczuk, P. Active carbons from waste biochars: structural and thermal properties. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 130, 15-24.
67. Anto, S.; Sudhakar, M.; Shan, Ahamed. T.; et al. Activation strategies for biochar to use as an efficient catalyst in various applications. Fuel 2021, 285, 119205.
68. Panwar, N. L.; Pawar, A. Influence of activation conditions on the physicochemical properties of activated biochar: a review. Biomass. Conv. Bioref. 2020, 12, 925-47.
69. Akhil, D.; Lakshmi, D.; Kartik, A.; Vo, D. N.; Arun, J.; Gopinath, K. P. Production, characterization, activation and environmental applications of engineered biochar: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 2261-97.
70. Venkatachalam, C. D.; Sekar, S.; Sengottian, M.; Ravichandran, S. R.; Bhuvaneshwaran, P. A critical review of the production, activation, and morphological characteristic study on functionalized biochar. J. Energy. Storage. 2023, 67, 107525.
71. Pandey, D.; Daverey, A.; Arunachalam, K. Biochar: production, properties and emerging role as a support for enzyme immobilization. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120267.
72. Cheng, B.; Zeng, R. J.; Jiang, H. Recent developments of post-modification of biochar for electrochemical energy storage. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 224-33.
73. Chai, W. S.; Aslam, A. A.; Li, X.; Wu, T.; Pang, C. H. Surface-engineered biochar: recent advances in modification strategies for environmental remediation and energy applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 117951.
74. Sun, L. M.; Mcintyre, S. R.; Iacomi, P.; et al. Biochar production, activation, and applications: a comprehensive technical review. Carbon. Capture. Sci. Technol. 2025, 16, 100421.
75. Xu, Z.; He, M.; Xu, X.; Cao, X.; Tsang, D. C. Impacts of different activation processes on the carbon stability of biochar for oxidation resistance. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 338, 125555.
76. Sajjadi, B.; Chen, W.; Egiebor, N. O. A comprehensive review on physical activation of biochar for energy and environmental applications. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2019, 35, 735-76.
77. Tsarpali, M.; Kuhn, J. N.; Philippidis, G. P. Activated carbon production from algal biochar: chemical activation and feasibility analysis. Fuel. Commun. 2024, 19, 100115.
78. Sajjadi, B.; Zubatiuk, T.; Leszczynska, D.; Leszczynski, J.; Chen, W. Y. Chemical activation of biochar for energy and environmental applications: a comprehensive review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2019, 35, 777-815.
79. Sakhiya, A. K.; Baghel, P.; Anand, A.; Vijay, V. K.; Kaushal, P. A comparative study of physical and chemical activation of rice straw derived biochar to enhance Zn2+ adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 15, 100774.
80. Longo, L.; Baldassin, D.; Di, Michele. A.; Bittencourt, C.; Menegazzo, F.; Signoretto, M. Activation strategies for rice husk biochar: enhancing porosity and performance as a support for Pd catalysts in hydrogenation reactions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2025, 15, 5101-15.
81. Hayashi, J.; Horikawa, T.; Takeda, I.; Muroyama, K.; Nasir, Ani. F. Preparing activated carbon from various nutshells by chemical activation with K2CO3. Carbon 2002, 40, 2381-6.
82. Wang, J.; Kaskel, S. KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23710.
83. Jagtoyen, M.; Derbyshire, F. Activated carbons from yellow poplar and white oak by H3PO4 activation. Carbon 1998, 36, 1085-97.
84. Angın, D.; Altintig, E.; Köse, T. E. Influence of process parameters on the surface and chemical properties of activated carbon obtained from biochar by chemical activation. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 148, 542-9.
85. Yagmur, E.; Gokce, Y.; Tekin, S.; Semerci, N. I.; Aktas, Z. Characteristics and comparison of activated carbons prepared from oleaster (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) fruit using KOH and ZnCl2. Fuel 2020, 267, 117232.
86. Lamata-Bermejo, I.; Alba, M. D.; Ramírez-Rico, J. Influence of the chemical activation with KOH/KNO3 on the CO2 adsorption capacity of activated carbons from pyrolysis of cellulose. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 114288.
87. Osman, A. I.; Hefny, M.; Abdel, Maksoud. M. I. A.; Elgarahy, A. M.; Rooney, D. W. Recent advances in carbon capture storage and utilisation technologies: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 19, 797-849.
88. Theo, W. L.; Lim, J. S.; Hashim, H.; Mustaffa, A. A.; Ho, W. S. Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Appl. Energy. 2016, 183, 1633-63.
89. Obi, D.; Onyekuru, S.; Orga, A. Minimizing carbon capture costs in power plants: a novel dimensional analysis framework for techno-economic evaluation of oxyfuel combustion, pre-combustion, and post-combustion capture systems. Energy. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 1749-70.
90. Kárászová, M.; Zach, B.; Petrusová, Z.; et al. Post-combustion carbon capture by membrane separation, Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 238, 116448.
91. Plaza, M.; García, S.; Rubiera, F.; Pis, J.; Pevida, C. Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: comparison of different regeneration strategies. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 163, 41-7.
92. Wang, R.; Wang, X.; Zhu, T. Research progress and application of carbon sequestration in industrial flue gas by microalge: a review. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 152, 14-25.
93. Raganati, F.; Ammendola, P. CO2 Post-combustion capture: a critical review of current technologies and future directions. Energy. Fuels. 2024, 38, 13858-905.
94. Yusuf, M.; Ibrahim, H. A comprehensive review on recent trends in carbon capture, utilization, and storage techniques. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 111393.
95. Du, J.; Yang, W.; Xu, L.; et al. Review on post-combustion CO2 capture by amine blended solvents and aqueous ammonia. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 488, 150954.
96. Knapik, E.; Kosowski, P.; Stopa, J. Cryogenic liquefaction and separation of CO2 using nitrogen removal unit cold energy. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 131, 66-79.
97. Yang, J.; Cao, N.; Liu, Y.; Lu, Y. CO2 capture with adsorption strategies: achievements, challenges, and prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 515, 145798.
98. Rezaei, F.; Rownaghi, A. A.; Monjezi, S.; Lively, R. P.; Jones, C. W. SOx/NOx removal from flue gas streams by solid adsorbents: a review of current challenges and future directions. Energy. Fuels. 2015, 29, 5467-86.
99. Khan, H.; Arshad, M.; Jalal, A.; et al. Mechanistic and data-guided design of biochar adsorbents for gas phase pollution control: a state-of-the-art review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2026, 33, 7424-51.
100. Ghazoui, M.; Boudouch, O.; Zahnoune, R.; et al. Next-generation biochar adsorbents from waste biomass: functionalization strategies and real-world water treatment applications. ENG. Environ. 2026, 20, 12.
101. Lund, A.; Manohara, G. V.; Song, A.; et al. Characterization of chemisorbed species and active adsorption sites in Mg-Al mixed metal oxides for high-temperature CO2 capture. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 3893-901.
102. Shen, X.; Lin, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Chemisorption contribution of support materials in CO2 capture by amine-impregnated adsorbents. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025, 13, 36166-76.
103. Bekhti, H.; Boucheffa, Y.; Blal, A. A.; Travert, A. In situ FTIR investigation of CO2 adsorption over MgO-Impregnated NaY zeolites. Vib. Spectrosc. 2021, 117, 103313.
104. Kim, C.; Lee, S.; Park, S. Efficient micropore sizes for carbon dioxide physisorption of pine cone-based carbonaceous materials at different temperatures. J. CO2. Util. 2021, 54, 101770.
105. Liu, R. S.; Shi, X. D.; Wang, C. T.; et al. Advances in post-combustion CO2 capture by physical adsorption: from materials innovation to separation practice. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 1428-71.
106. Singh, J.; Gupta, A.; Zhu, Z.; Tiwari, S. K.; Dhaliwal, A. S. Tailoring carbon nanomaterial architectures for CO2 capture: structure-property relationships, surface engineering, and future perspectives. Mater. Adv. 2026, 7, 3031-71.
107. Zhao, T.; He, X.; Islam, M. A.; Palash, M.; Saha, B. B. Metal-assisted pore architecture regulating CO2 adsorption and supercapacitor performance in biomass-derived carbons. Environ. Res. 2026, 305, 124986.
108. Ahn, H.; Kim, S.; Xu, R.; Lee, J. W.; Kang, Y. T. Structural modified metal-organic frameworks by hierarchical layer-by-layer method for efficient CO2 capture enhancement. J. CO2. Util. 2023, 77, 102603.
109. Wang, T.; Quan, X.; Sun, Z.; Sun, Z. Sustainable biochar synthesis via synergistic H2O2-KOH modification for enhanced CO2 physisorption. Carbon. Capture. Sci. Technol. 2025, 15, 100438.
110. Gan, F.; Wang, B.; Guo, J.; et al. Green synthesis of porous biochar with interconnected pore architectures from typical silicon-rich rice husk for efficient CO2 capture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 302, 122089.
111. Wang, C.; Luo, X.; Zhu, X.; et al. The strategies for improving carbon dioxide chemisorption by functionalized ionic liquids. RSC. Adv. 2013, 3, 15518.
112. Chen, J.; Li, H.; Zhong, M.; Yang, Q. Tuning the surface polarity of microporous organic polymers for CO2 capture. Chem. Asian. J. 2017, 12, 2291-8.
113. He, M.; Zhao, H.; Jia, J.; et al. Multiscale analysis of CO2 adsorption mechanisms on porous carbon: an investigation into the impact of intrinsic defects and pore size. Environ. Res. 2025, 267, 120701.
114. Zhong, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Hao, D.; et al. Electrochemically integrated carbon capture and utilization. ACS. Mater. Lett. 2025, 7, 3952-73.
115. Mahzari, M. Y.; Ullah, S.; Assiri, M. A. Pre and post synthetic modifications of MOF-5 by graphene oxide and deep eutectic solvents for chemisorption and physisorption of CO2. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 10262-72.
116. Kurisingal, J. F.; Choe, J. H.; Kim, H.; Youn, J.; Cheon, G.; Hong, C. S. Post-synthetic modifications of MOF-74 type frameworks for enhancing 2 capture and moisture stability. Bull. Korean. Chem. Soc. 2024, 45, 675-88.
117. Zhou, F.; Zhou, J.; Gao, X.; Kong, C.; Chen, L. Facile synthesis of MOFs with uncoordinated carboxyl groups for selective CO2 capture via postsynthetic covalent modification. RSC. Adv. 2017, 7, 3713-9.
118. Plaza, M. G.; Thurecht, K. J.; Pevida, C.; et al. Influence of oxidation upon the CO2 capture performance of a phenolic-resin-derived carbon. Fuel. Process. Technol. 2013, 110, 53-60.
119. Liao, Q.; Yuan, Y.; Cao, J. One-step synthesis of hydroxyl-functionalized ionic hyper-cross-linked polymers with high surface areas for efficient CO2 capture and fixation. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2024, 665, 958-68.
120. Al-Hajri, W.; De Luna, Y.; Bensalah, N. Review on recent applications of nitrogen-doped carbon materials in CO2 capture and energy conversion and storage. Energy. Technol. 2022, 10, 2200498.
121. Ma, X.; Li, L.; Zeng, Z.; et al. Experimental and theoretical demonstration of the relative effects of O-doping and N-doping in porous carbons for CO2 capture. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 481, 1139-47.
122. Sevilla, M.; Parra, J. B.; Fuertes, A. B. Assessment of the role of micropore size and N-doping in CO2 capture by porous carbons. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2013, 5, 6360-8.
123. Ren, X.; Li, H.; Chen, J.; et al. N-doped porous carbons with exceptionally high CO2 selectivity for CO2 capture. Carbon 2017, 114, 473-81.
124. Petrovic, B.; Gorbounov, M.; Masoudi Soltani, S. Impact of surface functional groups and their introduction methods on the mechanisms of CO2 adsorption on porous carbonaceous adsorbents. Carbon. Capture. Sci. Technol. 2022, 3, 100045.
125. Sun, F.; Liu, X.; Gao, J.; et al. Highlighting the role of nitrogen doping in enhancing CO2 uptake onto carbon surfaces: a combined experimental and computational analysis. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016, 4, 18248-52.
126. Sun, W.; Zheng, X.; Ji, B.; et al. Nitrogen self-doping hierarchical pore biochar for enhanced CO2 capture: modulation of pore structure and surface properties. Langmuir 2025, 41, 8876-88.
127. Hsu, C.; Kuo, I.; Hsi, H.; Lam, S. S.; Huang, Y.; Ting, Y. Single-step pyrolytic synthesis of ultra-microporous ammonialized biochar for carbon dioxide capture. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 381, 125197.
128. Wang, M.; Yin, Q.; Wang, R.; et al. Mechanism of CO2 adsorption on the green oxygen-doped hierarchical biochar activated by dual organic salts. Langmuir 2026, 42, 3050-62.
129. Chen, J.; Lin, J.; Luo, J.; et al. Enhanced CO2 capture performance of N, S co-doped biochar prepared by microwave pyrolysis: synergistic modulation of microporous structure and functional groups. Fuel 2025, 379, 132987.
130. Kim, K.; Han, J. W.; Lee, K. S.; Lee, W. B. Promoting alkali and alkaline-earth metals on MgO for enhancing CO2 capture by first-principles calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 24818-23.
131. Hu, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Gu, C. Computational screening of alkali, alkaline earth, and transition metals alkoxide-functionalized metal-organic frameworks for CO2 capture. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018, 122, 19015-24.
132. Cui, H.; Cheng, Z.; Zhou, Z. Unravelling the role of alkaline earth metal carbonates in intermediate temperature CO2 capture using alkali metal salt-promoted MgO-based sorbents. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 18280-91.
133. Han, Z.; Qiao, T.; Pan, H.; et al. Alkali/alkaline earth metal-doped 2D carbonaceous materials for ultra-high CO2 capture and separation. J. Mater. Sci. 2025, 60, 9163-75.
134. Lahijani, P.; Mohammadi, M.; Mohamed, A. R. Metal incorporated biochar as a potential adsorbent for high capacity CO2 capture at ambient condition. J. CO2. Util. 2018, 26, 281-93.
135. Li, D.; Sun, L.; He, R.; et al. Hierarchically porous MgO/biochar composites for efficient CO2 capture: structure, performance and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 498, 155607.
136. Arjona-Jaime, P.; Morales-Ospino, R.; Izquierdo, M. T.; et al. Ca-modified biochar by microwave irradiation for robust CO2 capture under realistic flue gas conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 525, 170349.
137. Chettiannan, B.; Muniappan, E.; Maninathan, I.; et al. Advances in carbon architectures for high-performance supercapacitors: challenges and future perspectives. J. Energy. Storage. 2026, 176, 123393.
138. Nandi, R.; Jha, M. K.; Guchhait, S. K.; Sutradhar, D.; Yadav, S. Impact of KOH activation on rice husk derived porous activated carbon for carbon capture at flue gas alike temperatures with high CO2/N2 selectivity. ACS. Omega. 2023, 8, 4802-12.
139. Razzak, S. A.; Uddin, S.; Hasan, A.; et al. Biomass-derived carbon materials as sustainable platforms for advanced biomedical applications. Environ. Surf. Interfaces. 2026, 4, 45-70.
140. Lee, Y.; Srinivaas, M.; Li, I.; et al. Palladium-catalyzed thermo, photo, and electrocatalytic CO2 conversion to methanol and formaldehyde: a review of mechanistic pathways using synthetic, biogas, and fossil-derived CO2. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 119187.
141. Yadav, V. S. K.; Al-Marri, M. J.; Saad, M. A. H. S.; Kumar, A. Understanding the progress and challenges in the fields of thermo-catalysis and electro-catalysis for the CO2 conversion to fuels. Emergent. Mater. 2023, 7, 1-16.
142. Pan, X.; Wang, C.; Li, B.; et al. Coupling enteromorpha prolifera-derived N-doped biochar with Cu-Mo2C clusters for selective CO2 hydrogenation to CO. Adv. Powder. Mater. 2025, 4, 100259.
143. Xu, J.; Sun, H.; Pan, X.; et al. One-step preparation of coconut shell derived mesoporous biochar supported CuZn catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Biomass. Bioenergy. 2025, 195, 107710.
144. Vali, S. A.; Moral-Vico, J.; Sánchez, A. Biochar-supported highly dispersed ultrasmall Cu/ZnO nanoparticles as a highly efficient novel catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. Biofuel. Res. J. 2025, 12, 2398-411.
145. Villardon, A.; Alcazar-Ruiz, A.; Cencerrero, J.; Romero, A.; Sanchez-Silva, L.; Dorado, F. Olive stone-derived biochar as a sustainable catalyst support for CO2 methanation. J. CO2. Util. 2025, 96, 103102.
146. Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, L.; et al. Biomass derived N-doped biochar as efficient catalyst supports for CO2 methanation. J. CO2. Util. 2019, 34, 733-41.
147. Yang, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; et al. One-pot synthesis of Ni/biochar catalysts for efficient CO2 methanation. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2026, 203, 153186.
148. Ma, J.; Lee, W.; Kim, J. H.; et al. Leveraging the intermetal distance in dual-atom catalysts: revealing optimized synergistic interactions for CO2 electroreduction. ACS. Nano. 2025, 19, 18698-707.
149. Lim, J. W.; Cho, W. S.; Lee, J. Kinetic Investigation of CuSx formation on Cu substrates for enhanced electrochemical CO2 reduction to HCOOH. Electron. Mater. Lett. 2025, 21, 245-51.
150. Kim, J. H.; Kim, J.; Ma, J.; et al. Spontaneous metal-chelation strategy for highly dense Ni single-atom catalysts with asymmetric coordination in CO2 electroreduction. Small 2024, 21, 2409481.
151. Kim, I.; Lee, G.; Kim, S.; et al. Unveiling the reconstruction of copper bimetallic catalysts during CO2 electroreduction. Nat. Catal. 2025, 8, 697-713.
152. Tan, Y.; Jia, S.; Tan, J.; et al. Coconut husk-derived biochar for enhancing electrochemical conversion of CO2. Mater. Today. Chem. 2023, 30, 101595.
153. Hu, K.; Jia, S.; Shen, B.; Wang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Lyu, H. Nickel phthalocyanine anchored onto N-doped biochar for efficient electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 154686.
154. Zhang, X.; Qian, J.; Liu, Z.; Yu, T.; Han, F.; Liu, J. N-doped biochar for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO and insight into active sites. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2025, 999, 119598.
155. Zhang, B.; Song, D.; Liu, Y.; et al. Porosity engineering of biochar-based single-atom Ni catalysts to promote 2 electroreduction over a broad potential window. AIChE. J. 2023, 69, e18175.
156. Wang, X.; Hu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; et al. High-performance electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide using biochar-supported gold nanoparticles. Energy. Fuels. 2025, acs.energyfuels.5c01058.
157. Dong, L.; Feng, D.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Mechanism of biochar-Cu-based catalysts construction and its electrochemical CO2 reduction performance. Carbon. Capture. Sci. Technol. 2024, 13, 100250.
158. Chen, W. Q.; Foo, J. L. C.; Veksha, A.; Chan, W.; Ge, L. Y.; Lisak, G. Tailoring Cu-loaded activated biochar-based catalysts via N-doping and surfactant modification for tunable C2/CH4 selectivity in CO2 electroreduction. Carbon 2025, 245, 120782.
159. Yu, Z.; Gu, M.; Wang, H.; et al. Dual sites on graphitic biochar for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to ethanol conversion. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024, 128, 4171-9.
160. Chen, C.; Zhang, J.; Qi, Y.; Zhang, J.; Guo, T.; Wang, H. Locust leaves-derived biochar coupled CuxO composites for efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Fuel 2024, 372, 132245.
161. Hu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; et al. Constructing fecal-derived electrocatalysts for CO2 upcycling: simultaneously tackling waste and carbon emissions. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 5056-63.
162. Lv, X.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; et al. Heterointerfaces trigger strong electron transport coupling in CuS/nitrogen-doped biochar with enhanced CO2 photoreduction. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2026, 322, 123098.
163. Lin, F.; Gao, M.; Wang, Y.; Yu, J.; Gao, C.; Zang, S. Enhanced mass transfer with amphiphilic CoOx/biochar for photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 605, 154612.
164. Yu, X.; Tang, X.; Luo, H.; Mao, Y. Construction of biochar assisted S-scheme of CeO2/g-C3N4 with enhanced photoreduction CO2 to CO activity and selectivity. Mater. Res. Bull. 2025, 181, 113085.
165. Yang, J.; Gao, G.; Zhu, Z.; Yu, X. Biochar modified Co-Al LDH for enhancing photocatalytic reduction CO2 performance and mechanism insight. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2022, 48, 2313-23.
