REFERENCES
1. Agrawal, A.; Choudhary, A. Perspective: Materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL. Mater. 2016, 4, 053208.
2. Kononova, O.; He, T.; Huo, H.; Trewartha, A.; Olivetti, E. A.; Ceder, G. Opportunities and challenges of text mining in aterials research. iScience 2021, 24, 102155.
3. Jessop, D. M.; Adams, S. E.; Willighagen, E. L.; Hawizy, L.; Murray-Rust, P. OSCAR4: a flexible architecture for chemical text-mining. J. Cheminform. 2011, 3, 41.
4. Hawizy, L.; Jessop, D. M.; Adams, N.; Murray-Rust, P. ChemicalTagger: a tool for semantic text-mining in chemistry. J. Cheminform. 2011, 3, 17.
5. Swain, M. C.; Cole, J. M. ChemDataExtractor: a toolkit for automated extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 1894-904.
6. Mavračić, J.; Court, C. J.; Isazawa, T.; Elliott, S. R.; Cole, J. M. ChemDataExtractor 2.0: autopopulated ontologies for materials science. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 61, 4280-9.
7. Hira, K.; Zaki, M.; Sheth, D.; Mausam; Krishnan, N. M. A. Reconstructing the materials tetrahedron: challenges in materials information extraction. Digit. Discov. 2024, 3, 1021-37.
8. Dagdelen, J.; Dunn, A.; Lee, S.; et al. Structured information extraction from scientific text with large language models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1418.
9. Yi, G. H.; Choi, J.; Song, H.; et al. MaTableGPT: GPT-based table data extractor from materials science literature. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2408221.
10. Polak, M. P.; Morgan, D. Extracting accurate materials data from research papers with conversational language models and prompt engineering. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1569.
12. Xu, D.; Chen, W.; Peng, W.; et al. Large language models for generative information extraction: a survey. Front. Comput. Sci. 2024, 18, 40555.
13. Pei, Z.; Yin, J.; Zhang, J. Language models for materials discovery and sustainability: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2025, 154, 101495.
14. Hira, K.; Zaki, M.; Mausam; Krishnan, N. M. A. MatSKRAFT: a framework for large-scale materials knowledge extraction from scientific tables. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.10448. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.10448. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
15. Sadruddin, S.; D’Souza, J.; Poupaki, E.; et al. Schema-Miner Pro: agentic AI for ontology grounding over LLM-discovered scientific schemas in a human-in-the-loop workflow. Semant. Web. 2025.
16. Odobesku, R.; Romanova, K.; Mirzaeva, S.; et al. Agent-based multimodal information extraction for nanomaterials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 1674.
17. Zhang, D.; Jia, X.; Tran, H. B.; et al. “DIVE” into hydrogen storage materials discovery with AI agents. Chem. Sci. 2026, 17, 3031-42.
18. Bran, A. M.; Cox, S.; Schilter, O.; Baldassari, C.; White, A. D.; Schwaller, P. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 525-35.
19. Chiang, Y.; Hsieh, E.; Chou, C. H.; Riebesell, J. LLaMP: large language model made powerful for high-fidelity materials knowledge retrieval. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.17244. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.17244. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
20. Ansari, M.; Moosavi, S. M. Agent-based learning of materials datasets from the scientific literature. Digit. Discov. 2024, 3, 2607-17.
21. Chepurova, A.; Bulatov, A.; Burtsev, M.; Kuratov, Y. Wikontic: constructing wikidata-aligned, ontology-aware knowledge graphs with large language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.00590. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.00590. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
22. Zhang, Q.; Wang, B.; Huang, V. S. J.; et al. Document parsing unveiled: techniques, challenges, and prospects for structured information extraction. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.21169. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.21169. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
23. Van, M. H.; Verma, P.; Zhao, C.; Wu, X. A survey of AI for materials science: foundation models, LLM agents, datasets, and tools. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.20743. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.20743. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
24. Zhong, X.; Tang, J.; Yepes, A. J. PubLayNet: largest dataset ever for document layout analysis. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Sydney, Australia. Sep 20-25, 2019. IEEE; 2019. pp. 1015-22.
25. Li, M.; Xu, Y.; Cui, L.; et al. DocBank: a benchmark dataset for document layout analysis. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2006.01038. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.01038. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
26. Chi, Z.; Huang, H.; Xu, H. D.; Yu, H.; Yin, W.; Mao, X. L. Complicated table structure recognition. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1908.04729. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.04729. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
27. Zhong, X.; ShafieiBavani, E.; Jimeno Yepes, A. Image-based table recognition: data, model, and evaluation. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1911.10683. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.10683. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
28. Smock, B.; Pesala, R.; Abraham, R. PubTables-1M: towards comprehensive table extraction from unstructured documents. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, USA. Jun 18-24, 2022. IEEE; 2022. pp. 4624-32.
29. Huang, Y.; Lv, T.; Cui, L.; Lu, Y.; Wei, F. LayoutLMv3: pre-training for document AI with unified text and image masking. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.08387. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.08387. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
30. Kim, G.; Hong, T.; Yim, M.; et al. OCR-free document understanding transformer. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2111.15664. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.15664. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
31. Lee, K.; Joshi, M.; Turc, I.; et al. Pix2Struct: screenshot parsing as pretraining for visual language understanding. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.03347. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03347. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
32. Liao, W.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Wang, C.; Huang, J.; Jin, L. DocLayLLM: an efficient multi-modal extension of large language models for text-rich document understanding. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.15045. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.15045. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
33. Shpigel Nacson, M.; Aberdam, A.; Ganz, R.; et al. DocVLM: make your VLM an efficient reader. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.08746. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.08746. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
34. Huang, B.; Hua, H.; Yu, Z.; Darrell, T.; Feris, R.; Herzig, R. DAVE: a VLM vision encoder for document understanding and web agents. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.17221. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.17221. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
35. Circi, D.; Bradley, M.; Blouir, S.; et al. Information extraction from diverse charts in materials science. In Proceedings of the LLM for Scientific Discovery: Reasoning, Assistance, and Collaboration, 2025. https://openreview.net/forum?id=vj8dqNrzEe. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
36. Liu, F.; Eisenschlos, J. M.; Piccinno, F.; et al. DePlot: one-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translation. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2212.10505. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.10505. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
37. Khalighinejad, G.; Scott, S.; Liu, O.; et al. MatViX: multimodal information extraction from visually rich articles. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.20494. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.20494. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
38. Polak, M. P.; Morgan, D. Leveraging vision capabilities of multimodal LLMs for automated data extraction from plots. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.12326. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.12326. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
39. Fang, X.; Wang, J.; Cai, X.; et al. MolParser: end-to-end visual recognition of molecule structures in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Honolulu, USA. Oct 19-25, 2025. IEEE; 2025. pp. 24528-38.
40. Wang, J.; He, Y.; Yang, H.; et al. GTR-CoT: graph traversal as visual chain of thought for molecular structure recognition. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.07553. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.07553. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
41. Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Feng, B.; Liu, W. MolSight: optical chemical structure recognition with SMILES pretraining, multi-granularity learning and reinforcement learning. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2511.17300. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.17300. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
42. Rajan, K.; Brinkhaus, H. O.; Zielesny, A.; Steinbeck, C. Advancements in hand-drawn chemical structure recognition through an enhanced DECIMER architecture. J. Cheminform. 2024, 16, 78.
43. Xia, R.; Mao, S.; Yan, X.; et al. DocGenome: an open large-scale scientific document benchmark for training and testing multi-modal large language models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.11633. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.11633. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
44. Dong, K.; Chang, Y.; Goh, X. D.; Li, D.; Tang, R.; Liu, Y. MMDocIR: benchmarking multimodal retrieval for long documents. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2501.08828. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.08828. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
45. Dong, K.; Huang, S.; Ye, F.; et al. Doc-Researcher: a unified system for multimodal document parsing and deep research. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2510.21603. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.21603. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
46. Clark, C.; Divvala, S. PDFFigures 2.0: mining figures from research papers. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Newark, USA. Jun 19-23, 2016. IEEE; 2016. pp. 143-52. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7559577. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
47. Cao, S.; Liu, K. Figuring out figures: using textual references to caption scientific figures. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.11008. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.11008. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
48. Sror, G.; Etzyoni, G.; Fire, M.; Berkovich, R.; Rokach, L.; Herskowitz, M. AI-driven methodology for mining scientific literature and extracting databases: a case study on a chemical process. Energy. AI. 2026, 24, 100741.
49. Sayeed, H. M.; Clark, C.; Sparks, T. D. KnowMat: transforming unstructured material science literature into structured knowledge. 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392925301_KnowMat_Transforming_Unstructured_Material_Science_Literature_into_Structured_Knowledge. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
50. Bayerlein, B.; Schilling, M.; Birkholz, H.; et al. PMD Core Ontology: achieving semantic interoperability in materials science. Mater. Design. 2024, 237, 112603.
51. Schilling, M.; Bresch, H.; Bayerlein, B.; Ruehle, B. WeChemSynOntology: semantic modeling of wet chemical syntheses in a self-driving lab for nano-and advanced materials. Digit. Discov. 2026, 5, 2074-88.
52. Garcia Trelles, E.; Schweizer, C.; Thomas, A.; von Hartrott, P.; Janka-Ramm, M. Digitalizing material knowledge: a practical framework for ontology-driven knowledge graphs in process chains. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11683.
53. Dreger, M.; Malek, K.; Eikerling, M. Large language models for knowledge graph extraction from tables in materials science. Digit. Discov. 2025, 4, 1221-31.
54. Saeedizade, M. J.; Blomqvist, E. Navigating ontology development with large language models. In Proceedings of the The Semantic Web, 2024. Springer, Cham; 2024. pp. 143-61.
55. Mateiu, P.; Groza, A. Ontology engineering with large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 25th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC), Nancy, France. Sep 11-14, 2023. IEEE; 2023. pp. 226-9.
56. Lippolis, A. S.; Saeedizade, M. J.; Keskisärkkä, R.; Gangemi, A.; Blomqvist, E.; Nuzzolese, A. G. Large language models assisting ontology evaluation. In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2025, 2026. Springer, Cham; 2026. pp. 502-20.
57. García-Fernández, J.; Verhoosel, J.; Ubacht, J.; Bakker, R. M. Ontology engineering with large language models: unveiling the potential of human-LLM collaboration in the ontology extension process. 2025. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-4020/Paper_ID_8.pdf. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
58. Li, J.; Poveda, M.; Garijo, D. Large language models for ontology engineering: a systematic literature review. Semant. Web. 2025.
59. Sadruddin, S.; D’Souza, J.; Poupaki, E.; et al. LLMs4SchemaDiscovery: a human-in-the-loop workflow for scientific schema mining with large language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.00752. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.00752. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
60. Sharma, K.; Kumar, P.; Li, Y. OG-RAG: ontology-grounded retrieval-augmented generation for large language models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.15235. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.15235. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
61. Buehler, M. J. Generative retrieval-augmented ontologic graph and multiagent strategies for interpretive large language model-based materials design. ACS. Eng. Au. 2024, 4, 241-77.
62. Ye, Y.; Ren, J.; Wang, S.; et al. Construction and application of materials knowledge graph in multidisciplinary materials science via large language model. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.03080. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.03080. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
63. Bai, X.; He, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Construction of a knowledge graph for framework material enabled by large language models and its application. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 1540.
64. An, Y.; Greenberg, J.; Uribe-Romo, F. J.; et al. Knowledge graph question answering for materials science (KGQA4MAT). In Metadata and Semantic Research, 2023. Springer, Cham; 2024. pp. 18-29.
65. Venugopal, V.; Olivetti, E. MatKG: an autonomously generated knowledge graph in material science. Sci. Data. 2024, 11, 217.
66. Li, S.; Wei, S.; Huang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Sun, S. Extracting and reconstructing knowledge in materials science literature using large language models. Commun. Mater. 2026, 7, 1043.
67. Lewis, P.; Perez, E.; Piktus, A.; et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2005.11401. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.11401. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
68. Taskiran, N. P.; Tsai, C. J.; Huang, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Venkatasubramanian, V. A knowledge-graph-based pharmaceutical engineering chatbot for drug discovery. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2025, 203, 109318.
69. Mishra, V.; Singh, S.; Zaki, M.; et al. LLaMat: large language models for materials science. In Proceedings of the AI for Accelerated Materials Design-Vienna, 2024. https://neurips.cc/virtual/2024/103725. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
70. Katsura, Y.; Kumagai, M.; Mato, T.; et al. Starrydata: from published plots to shared materials data. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. Methods. 2025, 5, 2506976.
71. Katsura, Y.; Mato, T.; Takada, Y.; et al. Development of LLM-assisted data curation tools for the Starrydata materials science database. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. Methods. 2025, 5, 2590811.
72. Tang, H.; Chen, Z.; Yao, X.; Xu, Z. Mechanical performance dataset for alloy with applications at low temperatures. Sci. Data. 2025, 12, 1235.
73. Itani, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zang, J. The northeast materials database for magnetic materials. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9415.
74. Kang, Y.; Lee, W.; Bae, T.; Han, S.; Jang, H.; Kim, J. Harnessing large language models to collect and analyze metal-organic framework property data set. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 3943-58.
75. Sipilä, M.; Mehryary, F.; Pyysalo, S.; Ginter, F.; Todorović, M. Annotated textual dataset PV600 of perovskite bandgaps for information extraction from literature. Sci. Data. 2025, 12, 1401.
76. Lee, S.; Cruse, K.; Gleason, S. P.; Alivisatos, A. P.; Ceder, G.; Jain, A. Data-driven analysis of text-mined seed-mediated syntheses of gold nanoparticles. Digit. Discov. 2025, 4, 93-104.
77. Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Tew, Y.; Ren, X.; Tang, X.; Wang, X. Distilling knowledge from catalysis literature with long-context large language model agents. ACS. Catal. 2025, 15, 18244-54.
78. Su, H.; Lei, S.; Chen, Y.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, Q. Human-machine collaborative design of SnTe-based thermoelectric materials via a multiagent framework leveraging large language models. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 17, 63572-84.
79. Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Q.; et al. Material Synthesis 2025 (MatSyn25) data set for 2D materials. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2026, 18, 7092-102.
80. Chen, Z.; Li, T.; Yang, Y.; et al. Intelligent information extraction pipeline driven by large language model for building polymer processing database. Polymer 2025, 336, 128875.
81. Zhou, H.; Bai, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. Large language models and machine learning framework for predicting dental ceramics performance. Int. Dent. J. 2026, 76, 109358.
82. Lee, S.; Cruse, K.; Baibakova, V.; Ceder, G.; Jain, A. Text-mined dataset of solid-state syntheses with impurity phases using large language model. Sci. Data. 2025, 12, 1969.
83. Cheng, Y.; Zhang, H. L2D: a versatile literature-to-data set pipeline for complex, user-specific data extraction in environmental research. ACS. EST. Water. 2025, 5, 4897-907.
84. Leng, Y.; Zhong, Y.; Gu, Z.; et al. Intelligent, personalized scientific assistant via large language models for solid-state battery research. ACS. Mater. Lett. 2025, 7, 1807-16.
85. Hu, H.; Stirrat, H. J.; Alayli, A.; Saeki, A.; Huang, Y. AI-powered workflow for constructing organic materials databases from the literature: integrating large language models. ACS. Omega. 2025, 10, 49545-56.
86. Fu, Z.; Huang, P.; Wang, X.; et al. Artificial intelligence‐assisted ultrafast high‐throughput screening of high‐entropy hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2025, 15, 2500744.
87. Zhou, J.; Wang, W.; Jiang, X.; Bai, B.; Su, Y. LLMs and NLP integration enables ion irradiation-induced swelling prediction in stainless steels. J. Nucl. Mater. 2026, 619, 156241.
88. Pichlmann, L.; Rafiezadeh, S.; Hofbauer, M.; Ocansey, E. D.; Österreicher, J. A. Predicting mechanical properties in aluminum alloys: a data-driven framework leveraging LLM-based data extraction and physics-based feature engineering. Mater. Today. Communs. 2025, 47, 112843.
89. Zhao, Z.; Hu, L.; Wang, H. Fine-tuned large language models for high-accuracy prediction of band gap and stability in transition metal sulfides. Materials 2025, 18, 3793.
90. Liu, J.; Anderson, H.; Waxman, N. I.; et al. Predicting materials thermodynamics enabled by large language model‐driven dataset building and machine learning. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2026, 8, e202500857.
91. Ozcan, A.; Coudert, F. X.; Rogge, S. M. J.; et al. Artificial intelligence paradigms for next-generation metal-organic framework research. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 23367-80.
92. Mo, B.; Yu, K.; Kazdan, J.; et al. KGGen: extracting knowledge graphs from plain text with language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.09956. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.09956. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
93. Radevski, G.; Gashteovski, K.; Hung, C. C.; Lawrence, C.; Glavaš, G. Linking surface facts to large-scale knowledge graphs. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.14909. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.14909. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
94. Gridach, M.; Nanavati, J.; El Abidine, K. Z.; Mendes, L.; Mack, C. Agentic AI for scientific discovery: a survey of progress, challenges, and future directions. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.08979. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.08979. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
95. Oliveira, O. N. Jr.; Christino, L.; Oliveira, M. C. F.; Paulovich, F. V. Artificial intelligence agents for materials sciences. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023, 63, 7605-9.
96. Wei, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. From AI for science to agentic science: a survey on autonomous scientific discovery. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.14111. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.14111. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
97. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Huang, W.; et al. Towards agentic intelligence for materials science. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2602.00169. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.00169. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
98. Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, P.; Liu, J.; Li, L. Active knowledge structuring for large language models in materials science text mining. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 2025, 13, 1186-203.
99. Li, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Zuo, Y.; et al. KnowCoder: coding structured knowledge into LLMs for universal information extraction. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.07969. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.07969. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
100. Li, B.; Conen, J.; Aller, F. AID-agent: an LLM-agent for advanced extraction and integration of documents. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop for Research on Agent Language Models (REALM 2025), Vienna, Austria. July, 2025. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2025. pp. 80-8.
101. Hu, B.; Liu, S.; Ye, B.; et al. A multi-agent framework for physical laws discovery. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.16416. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.16416. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
102. Ghosh, S.; Tewari, A. LLM-based AI agents for automated extraction of material properties and structural features. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2026, 265, 114521.
103. Chakraborty, A.; Taskiran, N. P.; Kottooru, R.; Mann, V.; Venkatasubramanian, V. Building hybrid AI models in chemical engineering: a tutorial review. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2025, 201, 109236.
104. Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Hou, Z.; Miret, S.; Liu, B. HoneyComb: a flexible LLM-based agent system for materials science. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.00135. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.00135. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
105. Jia, S.; Zhang, C.; Fung, V. LLMatDesign: autonomous materials discovery with large language models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.13163. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.13163. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
106. Kang, Y.; Kim, J. ChatMOF: an artificial intelligence system for predicting and generating metal-organic frameworks using large language models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4705.
107. Bazgir, A.; Madugula, R. C. P.; Zhang, Y. MatAgent: a human-in-the-loop multi-agent LLM framework for accelerating the material science discovery cycle. In Proceedings of the AI for Accelerated Materials Design - ICLR 2025, 2025. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=2Nm6Ef4tZD. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
108. Ni, Z.; Li, Y.; Hu, K.; et al. MatPilot: an LLM-enabled AI materials scientist under the framework of human-machine collaboration. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.08063. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.08063. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
109. Huang, Z.; He, L.; Yang, Y.; et al. Application of machine reading comprehension techniques for named entity recognition in materials science. J. Cheminform. 2024, 16, 76.
110. Mysore, S.; Jensen, Z.; Kim, E.; et al. The materials science procedural text corpus: annotating materials synthesis procedures with shallow semantic structures. In Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Florence, Italy. August, 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2019. pp. 56-64.
111. Sriramanan, G.; Bharti, S.; Sadasivan, V. S.; Saha, S.; Kattakinda, P.; Feizi, S. LLM-check: investigating detection of hallucinations in large language models. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada. Dec 10-15, 2024. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS); 2024. pp. 34188-216.
112. Takahara, W.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Ogano, M.; et al. Materials dual-source knowledge retrieval-augmented generation for local large language models in photocatalysts. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 13098-114.
113. Müller, S. How to crack a SMILES: automatic crosschecked chemical structure resolution across multiple services using MoleculeResolver. J. Cheminform. 2025, 17, 117.
114. Norouzi, E.; Waitelonis, J.; Sack, H. The landscape of ontologies in materials science and engineering: a survey and evaluation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.06034. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06034. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
115. Clark, S.; Bleken, F. L.; Stier, S.; et al. Toward a unified description of battery data. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2022, 12, 2102702.
116. Bayerlein, B. PMDco - platform material digital core ontology. In Proceedings of the FEMS EUROMAT 2023, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Sep 03-07, 2023. 2023. https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bam/frontdoor/index/index/year/2023/docId/58197. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
117. Rajamohan, B. P.; Bradley, A. C. H.; Tran, V. D.; et al. Materials data science ontology(MDS-Onto): unifying domain knowledge in materials and applied data science. Sci. Data. 2025, 12, 628.
118. Xu, Y.; Wu, Y. J.; Li, H.; et al. A comprehensive data network for data-driven study of battery materials. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2024, 25, 2403328.
119. Wu, F.; Zheng, X.; Qu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Feng, Z.; Li H. Grounding generative planners in verifiable logic: a hybrid architecture for trustworthy embodied AI. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2602.08373. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08373. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
120. Athar, S.; Mecibah, A.; Jund, P. Tackling dataset curation challenges towards reliable machine learning: a case study on thermoelectric materials. Mater. Today. Phys. 2025, 59, 101948.
121. Huang, S.; Cole, J. M. A database of battery materials auto-generated using ChemDataExtractor. Sci. Data. 2020, 7, 260.
122. Schilling-Wilhelmi, M.; Ríos-García, M.; Shabih, S.; et al. From text to insight: large language models for chemical data extraction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025, 54, 1125-50.
123. Trewartha, A.; Walker, N.; Huo, H.; et al. Quantifying the advantage of domain-specific pre-training on named entity recognition tasks in materials science. Patterns 2022, 3, 100488.
124. Rajan, K.; Zielesny, A.; Steinbeck, C. STOUT V2.0: SMILES to IUPAC name conversion using transformer models. J. Cheminform. 2024, 16, 146.
125. Hu, B.; Lin, A.; Brinson, L. C. ChemProps: a RESTful API enabled database for composite polymer name standardization. J. Cheminform. 2021, 13, 22.
126. Marshall, J.; Sanchez, S. L.; Desai, R.; et al. POLARIS: perovskite optimization using LLM-assisted refinement and intelligent screening. Digit. Discov. 2026, 5, 1765-82.
127. Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.; Liu, Z.; et al. A materials terminology knowledge graph automatically constructed from text corpus. Sci. Data. 2024, 11, 600.
128. Na, Y.; Kim, J. J.; Park, C.; et al. Advanced scientific information mining using LLM-driven approaches in layered cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Mater. Adv. 2025, 6, 2543-8.
129. Krotkov, N. A.; Sbytov, D. A.; Chakhoyan, A. A.; et al. Nanostructured material design via a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach: bridging laboratory practice and scientific literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 11064-78.
130. Reed, S. M. Augmented and programmatically optimized LLM prompts reduce chemical hallucinations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 4274-80.
131. Cornelio, C.; Ito, T.; Cory-Wright, R.; Dash, S.; Horesh, L. The need for verification in AI-driven scientific discovery. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.01398. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.01398. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
132. Liu, X.; Chen, T.; Da, L.; Chen, C.; Lin, Z.; Wei, H. Uncertainty quantification and confidence calibration in large language models: a survey. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2, Toronto, Canada. 2025. Association for Computing Machinery; 2025. pp. 6107-17.
133. Wang, X.; Raj, A.; Luebbe, M.; Wen, H.; Xu, S.; Lu, K. Reliable end-to-end material information extraction from the literature with source-tracked multi-stage large language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2510.05142. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.05142. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
134. Blagec, K.; Dorffner, G.; Moradi, M.; Ott, S.; Samwald, M. A global analysis of metrics used for measuring performance in natural language processing. In Proceedings of NLP Power! The First Workshop on Efficient Benchmarking in NLP, Dublin, Ireland. May, 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2022. pp. 52-63.
135. Lederbauer, M.; Betala, S.; Li, X.; et al. LeMat-Synth: a multi-modal toolbox to curate broad synthesis procedure databases from scientific literature. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2510.26824. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.26824. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
136. Mullick, A.; Ghosh, A.; Chaitanya, G. S.; et al. MatSciRE: leveraging pointer networks to automate entity and relation extraction for material science knowledge-base construction. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 233, 112659.
137. Foppiano, L.; Dieb, S.; Suzuki, A.; et al. SuperMat: construction of a linked annotated dataset from superconductors-related publications. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. Methods. 2021, 1, 34-44.
138. Song, Y.; Miret, S.; Liu, B. MatSci-NLP: evaluating scientific language models on materials science language tasks using text-to-schema modeling. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.08264. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.08264. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
139. Niyongabo Rubungo, A.; Li, K.; Hattrick-Simpers, J.; Bousso Dieng, A. LLM4Mat-bench: benchmarking large language models for materials property prediction. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2025, 6, 020501.
140. Zhong, Z.; Zhou, K.; Mottin, D. Benchmarking large language models for molecule prediction tasks. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.05075. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.05075. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
141. Alampara, N.; Mandal, I.; Khetarpal, P.; et al. MacBench: a multimodal chemistry and materials science benchmark. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024), 2024. https://neurips.cc/virtual/2024/103763. (accessed on 29 Jul 2026).
142. Wang, H.; Fu, T.; Du, Y.; et al. Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature 2023, 620, 47-60.
143. Shumailov, I.; Shumaylov, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Papernot, N.; Anderson, R.; Gal, Y. AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data. Nature 2024, 631, 755-9.
144. Canty, R. B.; Bennett, J. A.; Brown, K. A.; et al. Science acceleration and accessibility with self-driving labs. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 3856.
145. Miret, S.; Krishnan, N. M. A. Enabling large language models for real-world materials discovery. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2025, 7, 991-8.
