Organophosphate pesticides in herbal mixtures from Bayelsa State, Nigeria: implication for human exposure and risks
Abstract
This study investigated the presence of organophosphate pesticides (OPPs) in fifty herbal mixture samples obtained from major towns in Bayelsa, Nigeria, to evaluate their safety. OPPs were quantified using a gas chromatograph (GC) coupled with a mass-selective detector after solvent extraction. The results showed that all fifty herbal mixtures contained detectable levels of OPPs, with detection frequencies for individual OPP congeners ranging from 52% for pyraclofos to 90% for diazinon, the most frequently detected congener. At least three OPPs were detected in each sample. Total OPP concentrations varied from 3.80 to 48.0 ng·L-1, 4.50 to 51.6 ng·g-1, and 2.96 to 18.1 ng·g-1 in liquid, powder, and capsule herbal mixtures, respectively. These concentrations were below the maximum residue limits (MRLs) set by the European Pharmacopeia. Computed hazard index (HI) values were generally < 1, indicating no significant non-carcinogenic risk associated with the ingestion of these herbal mixtures. The contribution of individual OPP congeners to the HI followed the order: O-ethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phenylphosphonothioate (EPN) > diazinon > pirimiphos-methyl > quinalphos > chlorpyrifos > chlorpyrifos-methyl. This study underscores the need for continuous monitoring and the application of rigorous scientific standards to herbal mixtures to ensure consumer safety.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Pesticides are broadly defined under the United States Federal Insecticides, Fungicides and Rodenticides Act (FIFRA) as substances or mixtures intended to prevent, destroy, repel, or mitigate pests, including insects, rodents, and weeds[1]. In agricultural activities, a range of pesticides are widely employed to control or eradicate undesired insects. Among these, organophosphate pesticides (OPPs) are particularly notable. OPPs are characterized by the presence of phosphate (or thio- or dithiophosphate) groups and organic components. Because of their potent insecticidal and herbicidal properties, combined with their ability to degrade rapidly in the environment, OPPs have become the most commonly used pesticides and herbicides in agricultural applications[2,3]. Globally, it is estimated that OPPs are responsible for 750,000 to 3 million cases of human poisoning annually. Exposure to OPPs can cause a range of acute symptoms, including headache, nausea, dizziness, excessive salivation, muscle twitching, weakness, tremors, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea, which are often early signs of toxicity[4,5]. Furthermore, both short-term and long-term exposure to OPPs has been linked to various neurotoxic conditions, such as intermediate syndrome, cholinergic syndromes, organophosphate-induced neuropsychiatric disorders, as well as immunotoxic, genotoxic, and carcinogenic effects[2,6].
Herbal medicines or medicinal plants have been widely used for centuries in many countries as both curative agents and dietary supplements due to their remarkable therapeutic benefits and minimal side effects[7-9]. It is estimated that over 80% of people in developing countries, including low- and middle-income nations, rely on plant-based materials for primary healthcare. Additionally, approximately 51% of all pharmaceutical formulations in developed nations are, in some way, derived from medicinal plants[10]. In Nigeria, herbal medicine has a long-standing tradition and is deeply embedded in cultural and traditional practices. Nigerian traditional medicine encompasses the use of plants, animals, and minerals for the prevention, treatment, and management of various health conditions. It plays a significant role in the healthcare system, especially in rural and underserved communities where access to conventional medical services may be limited[11].
Nonetheless, the growing use of herbal mixtures and the expansion of the global market have raised safety concerns among healthcare professionals and regulatory authorities. Reports from various regions of the world indicate that herbal medications sometimes contain undisclosed or undesirable ingredients. To address this, numerous international organizations and nations have established guidelines regarding pesticide levels in herbal plants and related products[12]. Studies on pesticide residues in herbal medicine and medicinal plants have identified OPP residues[13-16]. However, in Nigeria, there is a notable lack of studies investigating the presence and associated risks of pesticide residues, particularly OPPs, in herbal medicines. The limited research available on pesticide contamination in Nigerian herbal mixtures[17,18] has primarily focused on organochlorines. Thus, this study aims to assess the occurrence and potential risks of OPPs in herbal mixtures sold in Bayelsa, Nigeria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Description of the study area
The study area is Bayelsa State, situated in the south-south zone of Nigeria, at the heart of the Niger Delta [Figure 1]. The state is located at latitude 4.7719° N and longitude 6.0699° E, with Yenagoa city as its capital. It shares borders with Delta State to the north, the Atlantic Ocean to the southwest, and Rivers State to the east. Bayelsa State spans a total area of 10,773 square kilometers and has a population of over 2.7 million
Sample collection
Fifty herbal mixtures were collected, comprising 35 liquids, 11 powders, and 4 capsules, from retailers and vendors in major towns across Bayelsa State, Nigeria, including Odi, Ogbia, Ekeremor, Brass, Nembe, Kaiama, Amassoma, Sagbama, Toru-Orua, Otuoke, Igbogene, and Yenagoa. For each brand, three samples were obtained and combined into a single mixture. An aliquot of the composite sample was taken for analysis. Details regarding the brand names, physical forms, ingredients, indications, origins, and other characteristics of the sampled herbal mixtures are given in Supplementary Table 1.
Reagents
All reagents used were of high purity (99.9%) and of analytical grade. A standard solution containing fourteen OPP congeners (diazinon, isazophos, chlorpyriphos-methyl, pirimiphos-methyl, fenitrothion, pirimiphos-ethyl, quinalphos, chlorpyrifos, triphenyl phosphate, O-ethyl O-4-nitrophenyl phenylphosphonothioate (EPN), phosalone, pyrazophos, azinphos-ethyl, and pyraclofos) was obtained from Accu Standard, USA. A stock solution of the OPPs (100 µg·mL-1) was prepared in n-hexane, and subsequent working standards were prepared by serial dilution in n-hexane. Deuterated chrysene, used as a surrogate standard, was procured from GFS Chemicals, Columbus, Ohio, USA. Additional reagents, including acetone, hexane, petroleum ether, Florisil, and anhydrous Na2SO4, were purchased from Labtech Chemicals, Italy.
Extraction of OPPs from herbal mixtures
The extraction procedure previously described by Pan et al. was followed[21]. For liquid herbal mixtures,
Chromatographic analysis
The extracted samples were analyzed for OPPs using an Agilent 6890A gas chromatograph (GC) coupled with an Agilent 5973 mass spectrometry detector (MSD) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA). Separation was achieved using an HP-5 5% phenyl methyl Siloxane capillary column (30 m × 0.25 μm ×
Method validation and quality control/assurance
This study followed the European Commission[22,23] guidelines for method validation. In addition to the recovery study, blank determinations were performed. Previously analyzed herbal mixtures were spiked with standard OPP solutions, and the spiked samples were subsequently analyzed. The percentage recoveries were then calculated. The herbal mixtures were spiked with OPP concentrations of 5, 10 and 20 ng·mL-1. OPP concentrations in the blank samples were below the limit of quantifications (LOQs). The recovery of OPPs ranged from 92.2% to 101%. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined based on the OPP concentration that produced a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, while the LOQ was taken as three times the LOD. The LODs and LOQs for the OPPs varied from 0.003 to 0.02 ng·g-1 and 0.01 to 0.06 ng·g-1, respectively. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for replicate analysis (n = 3) was less than 8%, and the R2 values from the calibration curves were > 0.9995.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis of the data obtained was conducted using IBM-SPSS software, version 23. Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to assess whether OPP concentrations varied significantly within the liquid, powdered, and capsulated herbal mixtures, as well as among the three groups, at a 95% confidence limit. OPP concentrations below LOQ were treated as zero in all statistical analyses and data computations.
Health risks assessment
Assessment of dietary intake of OPPs
The dietary intake (DI) of OPPs from herbal mixtures was assessed using the following Equation (1);
Ingestion rates (IRs) of 0.25 and 0.75 L·day-1 and corresponding body weight (BW) of 15 and 60 kg were used for children and adults, respectively[24].
Assessment of non-carcinogenic risk
The non-carcinogenic risk related to OPPs via the intake of these herbal mixtures was evaluated as hazard quotients (HQ) and hazard index (HI) using Equations (2) and (3)[2,18,25]. The HQ for each OPP was calculated and the HI was obtained by summing the HQs of individual OPP based on dose additivity[2,26]. In this study, only the six OPPs with established oral reference dose (RfD) were used for the risk assessment.
The definition and values of variables in equation 2 are given in Supplementary Materials and our previous study[2,18]. The RfD values used were chlorpyrifos (1 × 10-3), chlorpyrifos-methyl (1 × 10-2),
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Occurrence of OPPs in herbal mixtures
The results of OPPs in the herbal mixtures are displayed in Table 1, Figures 2 and 3, and Supplementary Table 2. The results showed that the detection frequency of OPP congeners in the herbal mixtures varied from 52% for pyraclofos to 90% for diazinon [Figure 2]. This variation suggests that the contamination of herbal mixtures by OPPs is pervasive, likely resulting from the use of OPPs in cultivating the plants used to prepare these mixtures. OPPs were detected in all 50 herbal mixtures, with at least three different OPPs detected in each sample [Figure 3]. The high prevalence of OPP contamination in the herbal mixtures in our study agrees with the findings reported by other researchers. For instance, Kowalska[28] reported a detection frequency of 72% in a survey of pesticide residues in 104 herbal samples in Poland. Similarly, pesticides were found in 54.6% of analyzed herbs, vegetables, and fruits from Egypt[29]. The findings of this study are further corroborated by another investigation[30], where 59% of the samples were found to contain pesticides. Additionally, pesticides were reported in 63% of herbal materials examined in Italy[31] and 55% in Tunisia[32]. In studies analyzing Chinese medicines made from herbal materials, pesticide residues were detected in 36.73% to 100% of the herb samples[33-36].
Figure 3. Distribution of herbal mixtures with detected OPP residues. OPP: Organophosphate pesticide.
Summary of OPP results in the herbal mixtures
OPPs | Detection frequency (%) | Liquid samples (n = 35) ng·L-1 | Powder samples (n = 11) ng·g-1 | Capsule samples (n = 4) ng·g-1 | European Pharmacopeia MRLs* | |||
Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | |||
Diazinon | 90.0 | 3.15 ± 3.22 | < LOQ-14.9 | 4.26 ± 5.59 | < LOQ-18.3 | 3.51 ± 1.08 | 2.57-4.85 | 500 |
Isazophos | 88.0 | 1.73 ± 2.05 | < LOQ-8.88 | 2.85 ± 3.85 | < LOQ-13.8 | 3.12 ± 5.50 | < LOQ-11.3 | - |
Chloropyriphos methyl | 86.0 | 2.72 ± 2.99 | < LOQ-10.5 | 2.28 ± 2.17 | < LOQ-6.89 | 0.64 ± 0.87 | < LOQ-1.85 | 100 |
Pirimiphos-methyl | 80.0 | 1.30 ± 1.65 | < LOQ-6.41 | 2.30 ± 5.38 | < LOQ-18.3 | 0.27 ± 0.47 | < LOQ-0.98 | 4000 |
Fenitrothion | 76.0 | 1.30 ± 1.77 | < LOQ-5.99 | 1.16 ± 1.69 | < LOQ-5.46 | 0.29 ± 0.57 | < LOQ-1.14 | 500 |
Pirimiphos-ethyl | 66.0 | 1.06 ± 1.69 | < LOQ-7.28 | 0.91 ± 1.17 | < LOQ-3.22 | < LOQ | < LOQ | 50 |
Quinalphos | 64.0 | 0.99 ± 1.35 | < LOQ-3.95 | 0.89 ± 2.04 | < LOQ-6.51 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | < LOQ-0.16 | 50 |
Chlorpyrifos | 68.0 | 1.03 ± 1.33 | < LOQ-5.83 | 0.55 ± 0.96 | < LOQ-3.03 | 0.04 ± 0.08 | < LOQ-0.16 | - |
Triphenyl phosphate | 74.0 | 1.28 ± 1.74 | < LOQ-7.98 | 0.81 ± 1.63 | < LOQ-5.32 | 0.01 ± 0.02 | < LOQ-0.03 | - |
EPN | 70.0 | 1.29 ± 1.76 | < LOQ-8.71 | 1.41 ± 3.95 | < LOQ-13.3 | 0.21 ± 0.29 | < LOQ-0.62 | - |
Phosalone | 60.0 | 0.38 ± 0.66 | < LOQ-3.15 | 0.87 ± 1.98 | < LOQ-6.40 | 0.11 ± 0.17 | < LOQ-0.36 | 100 |
Pyrazophos | 78.0 | 1.87 ± 3.07 | < LOQ-12.6 | 0.21 ± 0.38 | < LOQ-1.09 | 0.03 ± 0.03 | < LOQ-0.07 | - |
Azinphos-ethyl | 58.0 | 0.52 ± 0.97 | < LOQ-5.17 | 0.23 ± 0.40 | < LOQ-1.18 | 0.03 ± 0.06 | < LOQ-0.12 | 100 |
Pyraclofos | 52.0 | 0.54 ± 1.15 | < LOQ-6.14 | 0.46 ± 0.90 | < LOQ-2.53 | 0.20 ± 0.39 | < LOQ-0.78 | - |
TOTAL | 100 | 17.4 ± 10.5 | 3.80-48.0 | 19.2 ± 12.8 | 4.50-51.6 | 8.49 ± 6.62 | 2.96-18.1 |
Numerous factors, including the biological characteristics of plants and the physicochemical characteristics of OPPs, influence the concentration of OPP residues in plants. These factors may exert either positive or negative synergistic effects on the half-lives of OPPs. The total OPP concentrations in the herbal mixtures ranged from 3.80 to 48.0 ng·L-1, 4.50 to 51.6 ng·g-1, and 2.96 to 18.1 ng·g-1 in liquid, powdered, and capsulated mixtures, respectively. The lowest and highest concentrations of total OPPs were observed in LHM32 and LHM9 for liquid samples, PHM5 and PHM11 for powder samples, and CHM3 and CHM4 for capsulated samples, respectively. Significant variations (P < 0.05) in OPP levels were noted both within each category of herbal mixtures and among the different categories. The occurrence of diazinon followed the order: powder > capsules > liquids. The diazinon levels in our study were comparable to those reported in the literature: the 5 ng·g-1[37] in Chinese herbal medicines and ranging from not detected to 98.2 ng·g-1[12] in medicinal plants consumed in Iran. Isazophos was present in the order of capsules > powder > liquids. For pirimiphos-methyl, EPN, and phosalone, the order of occurrence was: powder > liquids > capsules. The pirimiphos-methyl levels in our study were similar to those documented in previous studies. Specifically, Sarkhail et al. reported pirimiphos-methyl concentrations of < 0.5 ng·g-1 in Iranian medicinal plants, while Adusei-Mensah et al. reported concentrations ranging from 8.0 to 82 ng·g-1 in herbal medicinal products from Kumasi, Ghana[12,14]. Other OPPs, including chlorpyrifos-methyl, fenitrothion, pirimiphos-ethyl, quinalphos, chlorpyrifos, triphenyl phosphate, pyrazophos, azinphos-ethyl, and pyraclofos, appeared in the order of liquids > powder > capsules. The level of fenitrothion in our study was lower than the 50 ng·g-1[14] reported for Ghanaian herbal medicinal products. Similarly, the chlorpyrifos levels in our study were lower than the 5.0 to 42.0 ng·g-1 range documented for Ghanaian herbal products[14]. On average, the total OPP concentration in the herbal mixtures followed the order: powder > liquids > capsules. This trend was also seen for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in herbal medicines[18]. The higher OPP concentrations in powdered herbal mixtures might be due to inadequate quality control and non-uniform application of active ingredients, in addition to uneven contamination during the formulation of herbal mixtures. The OPP concentrations obtained in our study were below their MRLs stipulated by the European Pharmacopeia[13].
Estimated daily intake and health risk of OPPs in the herbal mixture
The estimated daily intake (EDI) of OPPs from the consumption of the studied herbal mixtures by children and adults is shown in Figure 4 and Supplementary Table 3. The daily intake of OPPs by adults varied from 0.05 to 0.60, 0.06 to 0.64, and 0.04 to 0.23 ng·kg-1 bw·day-1 for liquid, powdered, and capsulated herbal mixtures, respectively. For children, the daily intake varied from 0.06 to 0.80, 0.08 to 0.86, and 0.05 to
Figure 4. Box plot of EDI of OPPs in the herbal mixtures. EDI: Estimated daily intake; OPPs: organophosphate pesticides.
The non-carcinogenic risk, represented by the HI, associated with OPP exposure through the ingestion of these herbal mixtures by children and adults is shown in Figure 5 and Supplementary Tables 4 and 5. The HI values ranged from 1.95 × 10-5 to 1.62 × 10-2 for adults and 2.61 × 10-5 to 2.16 × 10-2 for children. The HI values were generally < 1, indicating no significant non-carcinogenic risk from ingesting these herbal mixtures. The contribution of each OPP congener to the HI followed this order: EPN > diazinon > pirimiphos-methyl > quinalphos > chlorpyrifos > chlorpyrifos-methyl.
CONCLUSION
This study provides the first comprehensive data on the occurrence, distribution, and risks of OPPs in herbal mixtures in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. All fourteen analyzed OPPs were detected across the herbal mixtures, with detection frequencies ranging from 52% for pyraclofos to 90% for diazinon, the dominant congener. At least three OPPs were presented in each of the fifty herbal mixtures, and the OPP concentrations were below their respective MRLs stipulated by the European Pharmacopeia. The computed HI values confirmed that ingestion of these herbal mixtures poses no significant non-carcinogenic risk, with EPN contributing the most to the HI values. Although the findings suggest minimal health risks, the study emphasizes the importance of continuous monitoring of herbal products. It also recommends applying the same scientific rigor required for conventional medicines to herbal mixtures to ensure their safety and reliability for consumers.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, visualization, methodology, writing - original draft, and funding acquisition: Tesi GO
Methodology, investigation, and resources: Lari B
Investigation, data curation, and formal analysis: Ogbuta AA
Investigation, methodology, and writing - original draft: Felagha I
Investigation, data curation, formal analysis, and project administration: Obodoka GC
Data curation, formal analysis, and visualization: Ogbomade WE
Methodology, formal analysis, resources, and writing - review and editing: Okpara KE
Resources, visualization, and writing - original draft: Osioma E
Validation, writing - review and editing, and supervision: Agbozu IE
Availability of data and materials
The data used and/or analyzed in this study are given in the work and Supplementary Materials.
Financial support and sponsorship
The authors hereby appreciate the Bayelsa State Government for the grant received for this study (Grant Number BYS/EDTFB/AD/105/Vol.1/009).
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2025.
Supplementary Materials
REFERENCES
1. USEPA. Basic information about pesticide ingredients. 2024. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/basic-information-about-pesticide-ingredients. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025].
2. Tesi, G. O.; Okpara, K. E.; Tesi, J. N.; Agbozu, I. E.; Techato, K. Human exposure to endocrine-disrupting organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides in locally produced and imported honey in Nigeria. Int. J. Environ. Health. Res. 2024, 1-21.
3. Camacho-Pérez, M. R.; Covantes-Rosales, C. E.; Toledo-Ibarra, G. A.; et al. Organophosphorus pesticides as modulating substances of inflammation through the cholinergic pathway. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4523.
4. Ore, O. T.; Adeola, A. O.; Bayode, A. A.; Adedipe, D. T.; Nomngongo, P. N. Organophosphate pesticide residues in environmental and biological matrices: occurrence, distribution and potential remedial approaches. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2023, 5, 9-23.
5. Wei, G.; Wang, C.; Niu, W.; et al. Occurrence and risk assessment of currently used organophosphate pesticides in overlying water and surface sediments in Guangzhou urban waterways, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 48194-206.
6. Mdeni, N. L.; Adeniji, A. O.; Okoh, A. I.; Okoh, O. O. Analytical evaluation of carbamate and organophosphate pesticides in human and environmental matrices: a review. Molecules 2022, 27, 618.
7. Ansari, M. K. A.; Iqbal, M.; Chaachouay, N.; Ansari, A. A.; Owens, G. The concept and status of medicinal and aromatic plants. In: Plants as medicine and aromatics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. pp. 129-44.
8. Chaachouay, N.; Azeroual, A.; Ansari, M. K. A.; Zidane, L. Use of plants as medicines and aromatics by indigenous communities of Morocco. In: Plants as medicine and aromatics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2023. pp. 33-44.
9. Chaachouay, N.; Zidane, L. Plant-derived natural products: a source for drug discovery and development. Drugs. Drug. Candidates. 2024, 3, 184-207.
10. Opuni, K. F. M.; Kretchy, J. P.; Agyabeng, K.; et al. Contamination of herbal medicinal products in low-and-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19370.
11. Eruaga, M. A.; Itua, E. O.; Bature, J. T. Exploring herbal medicine regulation in Nigeria: balancing traditional practices with modern standards. GSC. Adv. Res. Rev. 2024, 18, 083-90.
12. Sarkhail, P.; Yunesian, M.; Ahmadkhaniha, R.; Sarkheil, P.; Rastkari, N. Levels of organophosphorus pesticides in medicinal plants commonly consumed in Iran. Daru 2012, 20, 9.
13. Klier, B.; Häfner, E.; Albert, H.; et al. Pesticide residues in herbal drugs: evaluation of a database. J. Appl. Res. Med. Aromat. Plants. 2019, 15, 100223.
14. Mensah, F. A. Pesticide residue and health risk analysis of six commonly used herbal medicinal products in Kumasi, Ghana. Texila. Int. J. Public. Health. 2018, 6, 186-95.
15. Mosaddegh, M. H.; Emami, F.; Asghari, G. Evaluation of residual diazinon and chlorpiryfos in children herbal medicines by headspace-SPME and GC-FID. Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 13, 541-9.
16. Wei, J. C.; Hu, J.; Cao, J. L.; et al. Sensitive detection of organophosphorus pesticides in medicinal plants using ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with sweeping micellar electrokinetic chromatography. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 2016, 64, 932-40.
17. Ajoke, O. R. Health risk assessment of organochlorine pesticide residues in selected herbal medicines sold in Lagos State, Nigeria. Asian. J. Biochem. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2024, 16, 42-54.
18. Tesi, G. O.; Felagha, I.; Ogbuta, A. A.; et al. Levels of endocrine disrupting organochlorine pesticides in herbal medicines from Bayelsa State, Nigeria: any threat to public health? Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci. 2024, 16, 595-606.
19. Odionkhere, K. T.; Efe, S. I. Climate change vulnerability on the inhabitants of Yenagoa, Bayelsa State. J. Manag. Soc. Sci. Res. 2020, 1, 54-65.
20. Oladimeji, O. E.; Ohwo, O. Assessment of flood risk and mapping of flood risk zones in Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2022, 26, 219-26.
21. Pan, L.; Sun, J.; Li, Z.; Zhan, Y.; Xu, S.; Zhu, L. Organophosphate pesticide in agricultural soils from the Yangtze River Delta of China: concentration, distribution, and risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 4-11.
22. European Commission. Guidance document on pesticide analytical methods for risk assessment and post-approval control and monitoring purposes. SANTE/2020/12830. Available from: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-03/pesticides_ppp_app-proc_guide_res_mrl-guidelines-2020-12830.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025].
23. European Commission. Analytical quality control and method validation for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. SANTE/12682/2019. Available from: https://www.eurl-pesticides.eu/userfiles/file/eurlall/aqcguidance_sante_2019_12682.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025].
24. Olusola, J. A.; Akintan, O. B.; Erhenhi, H. A.; Osanyinlusi, O. O. Heavy metals and health risks associated with consumption of herbal plants sold in a major urban market in Southwest, Nigeria. J. Health. Pollut. 2021, 11, 210915.
25. USDOE (United States Department of Energy). The risk assessment information system. Available from: https://rais.ornl.gov/documents/RAIS_ORNL_6942.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025].
26. Ben, M. S.; Nyanzi, S. A.; Kwetegyeka, J.; et al. Organochlorine pesticide residues in Uganda’s honey as a bioindicator of environmental contamination and reproductive health implications to consumers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 214, 112094.
27. USEPA. Regional screening levels (RSL) summary tables. 2022. Available from: https://www.hawaiipublicschools.org/DOE%20Forms/HIDOE-Soil-Sampling-LahainaSchools-Lab-Results.pdf. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025].
29. Farag, R. S.; Abdel, L. M. S.; Abd, E. G. A. E.; Dogheim, S. M. Monitoring of pesticide residues in some Egyptian herbs, fruits and vegetables. Int. Food. Res. J. 2011, 18, 659-65. Available from: http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/18%20(02)%202011/(27)%20IFRJ. [Last accessed on 6 Jan 2025]
30. Reinholds, I.; Pugajeva, I.; Bavrins, K.; Kuckovska, G.; Bartkevics, V. Mycotoxins, pesticides and toxic metals in commercial spices and herbs. Food. Addit. Contam. Part. B. Surveill. 2017, 10, 5-14.
31. Siméon, F. M.; Coralie, A.; Clara, L.; Johann, H.; Sylvain, K. Pesticide residues in botanics used in feed additives: focusing on wild vs. cultivable plants. In sed in feed additives: Focusing on wild vs. cultivable plants. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. Remed. 2019, 7, 36-44.
32. Di, B. G.; Potortì, A. G.; Ben, T. A.; et al. Organic contamination of Italian and Tunisian culinary herbs and spices. J. Environ. Sci. Health. B. 2019, 54, 345-56.
33. Tong, H.; Tong, Y.; Xue, J.; Liu, D.; Wu, X. Multi-residual pesticide monitoring in commercial Chinese herbal medicines by gas chromatography–triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Food. Anal. Methods. 2014, 7, 135-45.
34. Chen, L.; Song, F.; Liu, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Xing, J.; Liu, S. Multi-residue method for fast determination of pesticide residues in plants used in traditional chinese medicine by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A. 2012, 1225, 132-40.
35. Du, G.; Song, Y.; Wang, Y. Rapid simultaneous determination of multiple pesticide residues in traditional Chinese medicines using programmed temperature vaporizer injection-fast gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34, 3372-82.
36. Harris, E. S.; Cao, S.; Littlefield, B. A.; et al. Heavy metal and pesticide content in commonly prescribed individual raw Chinese Herbal Medicines. Sci. Total. Environ. 2011, 409, 4297-305.
Cite This Article
How to Cite
Tesi, G. O.; Lari, B.; Ogbuta, A. A.; Felagha, I.; Obodoka, G. C.; Ogbomade, W. E.; Okpara, K. E.; Osioma, E.; Agbozu, I. E. Organophosphate pesticides in herbal mixtures from Bayelsa State, Nigeria: implication for human exposure and risks. J. Environ. Expo. Assess. 2025, 4, 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jeea.2024.30
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.