REFERENCES

1. Cameron, D. E.; Bashor, C. J.; Collins, J. J. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 381-90.

2. Kitano, H. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 2002, 295, 1662-4.

3. Bunne, C.; Roohani, Y.; Rosen, Y.; et al. How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelligence: priorities and opportunities. Cell 2024, 187, 7045-63.

4. Tomita, M. Whole-cell simulation: a grand challenge of the 21st century. Trends. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 205-10.

5. Bray, D. Protein molecules as computational elements in living cells. Nature 1995, 376, 307-12.

6. Collins, F. S.; Varmus, H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 793-5.

7. Alon, U. Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer. Science 2003, 301, 1866-7.

8. Ashley, E. A. Towards precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016, 17, 507-22.

9. Cui, H.; Wang, C.; Maan, H.; et al. scGPT: toward building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI. Nat. Methods. 2024, 21, 1470-80.

10. Theodoris, C. V.; Xiao, L.; Chopra, A.; et al. Transfer learning enables predictions in network biology. Nature 2023, 618, 616-24.

11. Ahlmann-Eltze, C.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Deep-learning-based gene perturbation effect prediction does not yet outperform simple linear baselines. Nat. Methods. 2025, 22, 1657-61.

12. Resasco, D. C.; Gao, F.; Morgan, F.; Novak, I. L.; Schaff, J. C.; Slepchenko, B. M. Virtual cell: computational tools for modeling in cell biology. Wiley. Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2012, 4, 129-40.

13. Slepchenko, B. M.; Schaff, J. C.; Macara, I.; Loew, L. M. Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell. Trends. Cell. Biol. 2003, 13, 570-6.

14. Abdulla, S.; Aevermann, B.; Assis, P.; et al. ; CZI Cell Science Program. CZ CELLxGENE Discover: a single-cell data platform for scalable exploration, analysis and modeling of aggregated data. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2025, 53, D886-900.

15. Yao, Z.; van Velthoven, C. T. J.; Kunst, M.; et al. A high-resolution transcriptomic and spatial atlas of cell types in the whole mouse brain. Nature 2023, 624, 317-32.

16. Replogle, J. M.; Saunders, R. A.; Pogson, A. N.; et al. Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq. Cell 2022, 185, 2559-75.e28.

17. Roohani, Y. H.; Hua, T. J.; Tung, P. Y.; et al. Virtual cell challenge: toward a Turing test for the virtual cell. Cell 2025, 188, 3370-4.

18. Adduri, A. K.; Gautam, D.; Bevilacqua, B.; et al. Predicting cellular responses to perturbation across diverse contexts with State. Cell 2026, 189, 5914-31.e20.

19. Wang, C.; Karimzadeh, M.; Ravindra, N. G.; et al. X-Cell: scaling causal perturbation prediction across diverse cellular contexts via diffusion language models. bioRxiv 2026, Epub ahead of print.

20. Karr, J. R.; Sanghvi, J. C.; Macklin, D. N.; et al. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 2012, 150, 389-401.

21. Thornburg, Z. R.; Bianchi, D. M.; Brier, T. A.; et al. Fundamental behaviors emerge from simulations of a living minimal cell. Cell 2022, 185, 345-60.e28.

22. Aghamiri, S. S.; Amin, R. The potential use of digital twin technology for advancing CAR-T cell therapy. Curr. Issues. Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 321.

23. Vallée, A. Multi-scale digital twins for personalized medicine. Front. Digit. Health. 2026, 8, 1753906.

24. Lyu, Y.; Li, Z.; Tran, V.; et al. Building digital twins of different human organs for personalized healthcare. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2601.11318. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.11318 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

25. Loew, L. M.; Schaff, J. C. The Virtual Cell: a software environment for computational cell biology. Trends. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 401-6.

26. Blinov, M. L.; Schaff, J. C.; Vasilescu, D.; Moraru, I. I.; Bloom, J. E.; Loew, L. M. Compartmental and spatial rule-based modeling with virtual cell. Biophys. J. 2017, 113, 1365-72.

27. Nickaeen, M.; Novak, I. L.; Pulford, S.; et al. A free-boundary model of a motile cell explains turning behavior. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005862.

28. Lee, S. H.; Myers, P. J.; Mendrzycki, M. C.; et al. Systems-level consequences of low RAF abundance for EGFR-ERK signaling. Biophys. J. 2026, 125, 881-900.

29. Macklin, D. N.; Ahn-Horst, T. A.; Choi, H.; et al. Simultaneous cross-evaluation of heterogeneous E. coli datasets via mechanistic simulation. Science 2020, 369, eaav3751.

30. Thornburg, Z. R.; Maytin, A.; Kwon, J.; et al. Bringing the genetically minimal cell to life on a computer in 4D. Cell 2026, 189, 2582-97.e27.

31. Heumos, L.; Schaar, A. C.; Lance, C.; et al. ; Single-cell Best Practices Consortium. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023, 24, 550-72.

32. Lähnemann, D.; Köster, J.; Szczurek, E.; et al. Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science. Genome. Biol. 2020, 21, 31.

33. Regev, A.; Teichmann, S. A.; Lander, E. S.; et al. ; Human Cell Atlas Meeting Participants. The human cell atlas. Elife 2017, 6, e27041.

34. Dixit, A.; Parnas, O.; Li, B.; et al. Perturb-Seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 2016, 167, 1853-66.e17.

35. Ståhl, P. L.; Salmén, F.; Vickovic, S.; et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 2016, 353, 78-82.

36. Biancalani, T.; Scalia, G.; Buffoni, L.; et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nat. Methods. 2021, 18, 1352-62.

37. Hao, M.; Gong, J.; Zeng, X.; et al. Large-scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Methods. 2024, 21, 1481-91.

38. Tejada-Lapuerta, A.; Schaar, A. C.; Gutgesell, R.; et al. Nicheformer: a foundation model for single-cell and spatial omics. Nat. Methods. 2025, 22, 2525-38.

39. Rosen, Y.; Roohani, Y.; Agrawal, A.; Samotorčan, L.; Quake, S. R.; Leskovec, J.; Tabula Sapiens Consortium. Universal cell embedding provides a foundation model for cell biology. Nature 2026, 656, 183-91.

40. Roohani, Y.; Huang, K.; Leskovec, J. Predicting transcriptional outcomes of novel multigene perturbations with GEARS. Nat. Biotechnol. 2024, 42, 927-35.

41. Zeng, Y.; Xie, J.; Shangguan, N.; et al. CellFM: a large-scale foundation model pre-trained on transcriptomics of 100 million human cells. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4679.

42. Kedzierska, K. Z.; Crawford, L.; Amini, A. P.; Lu, A. X. Zero-shot evaluation reveals limitations of single-cell foundation models. Genome. Biol. 2025, 26, 101.

43. Zhang, H.; Yuan, G. H.; Yuan, C.; et al. Lingshu-Cell: a generative cellular world model for transcriptome modeling toward virtual cells. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.25240. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.25240 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

44. Megas, S.; Chen, D. G.; Polanski, K.; et al. Celcomen: spatial causal disentanglement for single-cell and tissue perturbation modeling. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 4126.

45. Roohani, Y.; Lee, A.; Huang, Q.; et al. BioDiscoveryAgent: an AI agent for designing genetic perturbation experiments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, 2025; pp. 26417-66. https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/hash/4252dc94531833029000f85dc5fac792-Abstract-Conference.html. (accessed 2026-10-20).

46. Tang, X.; Yu, Z.; Chen, J.; et al. CellForge: agentic design of virtual cell models. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2508.02276. Available online: hhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02276v1 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

47. Cheng, X.; Li, P.; Guo, H.; et al. Harnessing AI to build virtual cells. bioRxiv 2026, Epub ahead of print.

48. Jang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Fawkes, J.; Denton, A. K.; Beaini, D.; Noutahi, E. Towards autonomous mechanistic reasoning in Virtual Cells. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2604.11661. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.11661 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

49. Xia, X.; Yao, C.; Tsoi, M.; et al. AblateCell: a reproduce-then-ablate agent for virtual cell repositories. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2604.19606. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.19606 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

50. Slepchenko, B. M.; Loew, L. M. Use of virtual cell in studies of cellular dynamics. Int. Rev. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2010, 283, 1-56.

51. Peng, R.; Gao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J. CellProphet: dissecting virtual cell differentiation through AI-powered dynamic gene regulatory network inference. bioRxiv 2025, Epub ahead of print.

52. He, S.; Zhu, Y.; Tavakol, D. N.; et al. Squidiff: predicting cellular development and responses to perturbations using a diffusion model. Nat. Methods. 2026, 23, 65-77.

53. Wei, Z.; Ma, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, Z.; Song, S.; Zheng, S. VCWorld: a biological world model for virtual cell simulation. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2512.00306. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.00306 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

54. Rafelski, S. M.; Theriot, J. A. Establishing a conceptual framework for holistic cell states and state transitions. Cell 2024, 187, 2633-51.

55. Ma, C.; Zhang, H.; Rao, Y.; et al. AI-driven virtual cell models in preclinical research: technical pathways, validation mechanisms, and clinical translation potential. NPJ. Digit. Med. 2025, 9, 25.

56. Guo, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, H.; et al. Modelling drug-induced cellular perturbation responses with a biologically informed dual-branch transformer. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2026, 8, 96-112.

57. Yan, Z.; Wu, Y.; Ji, M. X.; et al. PRiMeFlow: capturing complex expression heterogeneity in perturbation response modelling. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2604.13986. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.13986 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

58. De Brouwer, E.; Edwards, C.; Wu, A.; et al. AssayBench: an assay-level virtual cell benchmark for LLMs and agents. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2605.10876. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.10876 (accessed 20 October, 2026).

59. Shcherbakova, A.; Sharma, K.; Chen, Y.; et al. Designing minimal E. coli genomes using variational autoencoders. bioRxiv 2025, Epub ahead of print.

60. Gherman, I. M.; Sharma, K.; Rees-Garbutt, J.; et al. Accelerated design of Escherichia coli reduced genomes using a whole-cell model and machine learning. Cell. Syst. 2025, 16, 101392.

61. Bergman, D. R.; Johnson, J. A. I.; Naji, M.; et al. BIWT: a bioinformatics walkthrough for embedding spatial multiomics in agent-based models for virtual cells. Bioinformatics 2025, 41, btaf571.

62. Bhardwaj, S.; Kumar, G.; Yang, H.; et al. Virtual cells: from conceptual frameworks to biomedical applications. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.18220. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.18220 (accessed 20 October, 2026).